Ingle v. Circuit City’s Empirical Analysis
408 F.3d 592 · 2005
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably Bates v. United Parcel Service, Inc. (2007), State v. Timothy Alan Dunlap (2013)
8 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1912 · 28 U.S.C. § 1927 · 9 U.S.C. § 16 (Federal Arbitration Act)
Relies on T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'n · Benitez v. Mata · Adriana International Corp. v. Thoeren · Ingle v. Circuit City Stores, Inc. · United States v. Lara
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Under the law of the case doctrine, a court is ordinarily precluded from reexamining an issue previously decided by the same court, or a higher court, in the same case.” For the law of the case doctrine to apply, “the issue in question must have been ‘decided explicitly or by necessary implication in [the] previous disposition.’ ””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.