Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 408 F.3d 75 - Bach v. Pataki

Bach v. Pataki’s Empirical Analysis

408 F.3d 75 · 2005

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
3
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Salerno · Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc. · Fw/pbs Inc II v. City of Dallas Mjr Inc · Agostini v. Felton Chancellor Board of Education of the City of New York · Doe v. Bolton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[the p]ossession of a pistol or revolver by a person to whom a license therefor has been issued.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Notwithstanding any other provision of any law or any rule or regulation of a State or any political subdivision thereof, any person who is not otherwise prohibited by this chapter from transporting, shipping, or receiving a firearm shall be entitled to transport a firearm for any lawful purpose from any place where he may lawfully possess and carry such firearm to any other place where he may lawfully possess and carry such firearm if, during such transportation the firearm is unloaded, and neither the firearm nor any ammunition being transported is readily accessible or is directly accessible from the passenger compartment of such transporting vehicle: Provided, That in the case of a vehicle without a compartment separate from the driver’s compartment the firearm or ammunition shall be contained in a locked container other than the glove compartment or console.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “in the city of New York the police commissioner of that city; in the county of Nassau the commissioner of police of that county; in the county of Suffolk the sheriff of that county except in the towns of Babylon, Brookhaven, Huntington, Islip and Smithtown, the commissioner of police of that county; for the purposes of section 400.01 of'this chapter the superintendent of state police; and elsewhere in the state a judge or justice of a court of record having his office in the county of issuance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.