Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

408 F. App'x 685

Azeez v. Keller

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided January 25, 2011

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2011-01-25

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2012

1 district ·

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2011-01-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Jamal A. Azeez seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his motion for expungement of criminal records. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Azeez seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Azeez’s motions to expedite and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4DISMISSED.

/408/fappx/685 · .json · Public domain