Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 408 F. Supp. 2d 1153 - Ferluga v. Eickhoff

408 F. Supp. 2d 1153 - Ferluga v. Eickhoff’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
June 2006
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Foman v. Davis · Neitzke v. Williams · Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A. · Hj Inc v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.