Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 408 Ill. App. 3d 799 - People v. Anthony

408 Ill. App. 3d 799 - People v. Anthony’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

21 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. · 223 Ill. 2d 569 - People v. Jones · 211 Ill. 2d 368 - People v. Harvey · 214 Ill. 2d 206 - People v. Collins · 175 Ill. 2d 435 - People v. Woodard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"A county board may enact by ordinance or resolution a court services fee dedicated to defraying court security expenses incurred by the sheriff in providing court services or for any other court services deemed necessary by the sheriff to provide for court security * * *. Such fee shall be paid in civil cases by each party at the time of filing the first pleading, paper or other appearance * * *. In criminal, local ordinance, county ordinance, traffic and conservation cases, such fee shall be assessed against the defendant upon a plea of guilty, stipulation of facts or findings of guilty, resulting in a judgment of conviction, or order of supervision, or sentence of probation without entry of judgment pursuant to Section 10 of the Cannabis Control Act, Section 410 of the Illinois Controlled Substances Act, Section 70 of the Methamphetamine Control and Community Protection Act, Section 12-4.3 of the Criminal Code of 1961, Section 10-102 of the Illinois Alcoholism and Other Drug Dependency Act, Section 40-10 of the Alcoholism and Other Drug Abuse and Dependency Act, or Section 10 of the Steroid Control Act. In setting such fee, the county board may impose, with the concurrence of the Chief Judge of the judicial circuit in which the county is located by administrative order entered by the Chief Judge, differential rates for the various types or categories of criminal and civil cases, but the maximum rate shall not exceed $25. All proceeds from this fee must be used to defray co”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “reimburses the State for the expense of operating a system under which this defendant's DNA profile was required to be processed and analyzed as a result * * * of this prosecution and conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.