Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 408 Md. 368 - Mitchell v. State

Mitchell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
2
states following
October 2021
most recently cited

66 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · State v. Evans · State v. Snowden · State v. Grady · Eley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If [defense counsel] thought that [their] being here would have shown that something we presented was so contradictory to something about them, he could have brought them in as well. The defense has subpoena power just like the State does. You can’t say why didn’t the State present a witness, when they had an equal opportunity to present it to you, and then try to say, well, it wasn’t presented. They had an equal right to present it if they thought it would contradict something we presented.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.