Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 408 Md. 490 - Crosby v. State

Crosby v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

81
cited by 81 later decisions
1
states following
December 2022
most recently cited

81 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 81 later decisions — most recently December 2022 · most notably Bailey v. State (2010), Motor Vehicle Administration v. Shea (2010)

81 state decisions

620200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Mapp v. Ohio · United States v. Cortez · Adams v. Williams · United States v. Arvizu

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Courts] must look at the “totality of the circumstances” of each case to see whether the detaining officer has a “particularized and objective basis” for suspecting legal wrongdoing. This process allows officers to draw on their own experience and specialized training to make inferences from and deductions about the cumulative information available to them that “might well elude an untrained person.” Although an officer’s reliance on a mere “hunch” is insufficient to justify a stop, the likelihood of criminal activity need not rise to the level required for probable cause, and it falls considerably short of satisfying a preponderance of the evidence standard.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““In reviewing a circuit court’s grant or denial of a motion to suppress evidence, we ordinarily consider only the evidence contained in the record of the suppression hearing. The factual findings of the suppression court and its conclusions regarding the credibility of testimony are accepted unless clearly erroneous. We review the evidence and the inferences that may be reasonably drawn in the light most favorable to the prevailing party. We undertake our own constitutional appraisal of the record by reviewing the law and applying it to the facts of the present case.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a police officer who has reasonable suspicion that a particular person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime may detain that person briefly in order to investigate the circumstances that provoked suspicion.” Crosby v. State, 408 Md. 490, 506 , 970 A.2d 894, 903 (2009) (quoting Nathan v. State, 370 Md. 648, 660 , 805 A.2d, 1086, 1093 (2002)). Police conduct a Terry investigation by asking”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.