Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 408 N.W.2d 748 - State v. Olson

State v. Olson’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
October 2022
most recently cited

35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently October 2022 · most notably State v. Guthmiller (2003), State v. Moeller (2000)

35 state decisions

16019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Maurer · Coastal Steel Corp. v. Wheelabrator-Frye, Inc. · Roemer v. United States · State v. Pointer · State v. Dace

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Questions of the relevance of proffered testimony are committed to the discretion of the trial court and this court will not reverse its ruling absent an abuse of discretion.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]o consummate an attempt to commit a crime there must be something more than mere intention or preparation. The attempt must be manifested by acts which would end in accomplishment, but for intervening circumstances occurring apart from, and independent of, the will of the defendant.... In other words, to constitute an attempt the acts of the defendant must go so far that they would result in the accomplishment of the crime unless frustrated by extraneous circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “This court has repeatedly held that reversible error cannot be predicated upon the denial of a motion in limine and that failure to specifically object to the evidence during trial forecloses complaint on the issue on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.