Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 408 P2D 307 - Bower v. Corbell

Bower v. Corbell’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
May 1974
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co. · Ebbert v. Philadelphia Electric Co. · Huset v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co. · Coe v. Esau · 85 Ga. App. 538 - JC Lewis Motor Co. Inc. v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The essential elements of a cause of action based on negligence may be inferred from all the facts and circumstances, and where the circumstances are such as to remove the case from the realm of conjecture and place it within the sphere of legitimate and rational inferences from established facts, a prima facie case is made.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"* * * An automobile is not inherently dangerous within itself. But when serviced and set in motion it becomes a contrivance of an inherently dangerous nature. Where reasonably certain to place life and limb in danger if negligently made or serviced it is a thing of danger."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.