In Re Kroth’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 1996
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Industrial Commission · California Highway Commission v. Industrial Accident Commissionn · Landrum v. Ownby · Taylor v. Arkansas Light & Power Co. · Anderson v. Dukes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““An agreement between the county commissioners of a county convict, by the terms of which it is sought to allow such convict a credit on his fine and costs in consideration of his performing work for the county during the term of his prison sentence, is void.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““A convict who is incarcerated in the State Penitentiary is not included in or subject to the terms and provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.