Bogdanski v. Budzik’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Marquis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“examine 'the record from the viewpoint most favorable to the party opposing the motion, giving to him all favorable inferences to be drawn' therefrom.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“The party requesting summary judgment bears the initial burden of establishing a prima facie case that no genuine issue of material fact exists, and that summary judgment should be granted as a matter of law.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“This Court affords no deference to the district court's ruling [on a motion for summary judgment], but instead reviews a 'summary judgment in the same light as the district court, using the same materials and following the same standards.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.