408 Pa. Super. 472 - Commonwealth v. Osellanie’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
April 2006
most recently cited
38 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Streeter v. United States · Commonwealth v. Young · Commonwealth v. Edwards · Commonwealth v. Monarch · 368 Pa. Super. 557 - Dorn v. Stanhope Steel, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Osellanie has failed to supply us with a complete record for our review. Pa.R.A.P. 1921. Specifically, he has failed to provide us with a transcript of his trial proceedings. Pa.R.A.P. 1911. Although Osellanie is before us in forma pauperis, it is nonetheless the appellant’s responsibility to order the transcript required and to ascertain its presence in the record prior to certification for appeal, (citation omitted)... Without a trial transcript or a. statement in lieu of a transcript, we are unable to conduct a proper review and analysis of Osellanie’s first issue, . . . Therefore, we must conclude that this issue has been waived for the purpose of appellate review.” Osellanie, supra at 475-76 , 597 A.2d at 131 , citing Commonwealth v. Lowry, 385 Pa. Super. 236 , 560 A.2d 781 (1989).”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.