Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 408 SC 302 - State v. Bennett

State v. Bennett’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Cherry · State v. Arnold · State v. Hernandez · State v. Bostick · State v. ODEMS

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e cannot say it would be unexpected to find Bennett’s DNA in the computer room and his fingerprint in the community room. Though the exact locations of the DNA and fingerprint evidence do raise a suspicion of his guilt, the evidence simply does not rise above suspicion. The evidence undoubtedly placed Bennett at the location where a crime ultimately occwTed; however, it is undisputed that Bennett was a frequent visitor to the location prior to the crime, and we disagree with the State’s assertion that the evidence placed Bennett at the scene of the crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.