State v. Hendricks’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Weston · State v. McHoney · State v. Jennings · Davis v. Apfel · State v. Kromah
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There are three elements to the foundation for the admission of a hearsay statement as a present sense impression: (1) the statement must describe or explain an event or condition; (2) the statement must be contemporaneous with the event; and (3) the declarant must have personally perceived the event.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Washington“[a] statement describing or explaining an event or condition made while the declarant was perceiving the event or condition, or immediately thereafter”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Prather“[a] statement relating to a startling event or condition made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event or condition”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Prather
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.