Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

408 So. 2d 744

State v. Lopez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 12, 1982

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1982-01-12

Relies on 360 So. 2d 774 - D'ALESSANDRO v. Shearer

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1982-01-12

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 2004

6 state decisions

20198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Lopez pled guilty to an information which charged him with carrying a firearm in the course of a robbery. Nonetheless, the trial court’s five-year sentence did not include a provision that he serve a minimum mandatory three-year term without eligibility for parole or gain time, as is required under these circumstances by Section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1979). We agree with the state’s position1 that there is nothing to justify this omission. D’Alessandro v. Shearer, 360 So.2d 774 (Fla.1978). Hence, the sentence is reversed in part and the cause remanded with directions to make the sentence imposed as to Count I of the information subject to the three-year mandatory requirement.2

¶2Reversed and remanded.

¶3. We have jurisdiction to consider its appeal as one from an illegal sentence under Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c)(1)(I) and Sec. 924.07(5), Fla.Stat. (1979).

¶4. The defendant need not be present for this amendment.

/408/so2d/744 · .json · Public domain