¶1(concurring).
¶2The writer concurs in the affirmance of the conviction for the reasons stated in his Dissent in Davison v. State, 166 Tex.Cr.R. 376, 313 S.W.2d 883, 885, and his Concurring Opinion in Kirk v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 401 S.W.2d 596.
408 S.W.2d 116
Leslie v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided June 1, 1966
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1966-06-01
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1986
1 state decisions
Relies on Davison v. State · Kirk v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1966-06-01
View the full empirical analysis of this case →