Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

408 S.W.2d 232

Brill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 23, 1966

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1966-11-23

Relies on Rangel v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1966-11-23

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 1986

7 state decisions

40196619701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 OPINION

WOODLEY, Judge.

¶2 The offense is felony theft; the punishment, 4 years.

¶3*233 The appellate record transmitted to this Court reflects that prior to its being filed in this Court the trial' judge granted appellant’s motion and allowed him to withdraw his notice of appeal.

¶4 Under the provisions of Art. 44.11 C.C.P., further proceedings in the trial court are not suspended until the appellate record is filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals.

¶5 As to further proceedings under Art. 40.09 C.C.P., after the appellate record has been filed in this Court, see Rangel v. State, 408 S.W.2d 231.

¶6 The trial court was not without authority to allow appellant to withdraw his notice of appeal.

¶7 Notice of appeal having been withdrawn, the clerk was not required to transmit the record on appeal to this Court.

¶8 The appeal is dismissed as of October 28, 1966, the date of the trial court’s order.

/408/sw2d/232 · .json · Public domain