Ex parte Roper’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 1971
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Escobedo v. Illinois · Jackson v. Denno · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · Roper v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The cases of Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 , 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977, and Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, have been held not to be retroactive”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Roper v. Beto“Under the evidence, the court was warranted in finding that appellant did not request to see an attorney prior to making the confession. 11”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Roper v. Beto
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.