In Re White’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
November 2009
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 506 · 11 U.S.C. § 707 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 1409 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on In Re Jass · Maney v. Kagenveama · Kibbe v. Sumski · Coop v. Frederickson · Hamilton v. Lanning
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.