Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 409 BR 508 - In Re Young

In Re Young’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 586 (§ 224 of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 (Title 11))

Relies on Butner v. United States · Marsch Marsch v. F Marsch · Idaho v. Arnold · Murrietta v. Fehrs (In Re Fehrs) · Wait v. Leavell Cattle, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well accepted that a filing by an individual who is an owner of a corporation brings into the estate only his ownership interest and not the assets of the corporation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “all legal or equitable interests of the debtor in property as of the commencement of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.