In Re Zieg’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
March 2016
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on 11 1024 70155 Thompson Thompson · In Re Ray · In Re Wiford · In Re Irwin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(4)(A) Subject to subparagraph (B), for purposes of paragraph (1)(B), the term "household goods" means— (i) clothing; (ii) furniture; (iii) appliances; (iv) 1 radio; (v) 1 television; (vi) 1 VCR; (vii) linens; (viii) china; (ix) crockery; (x) kitchenware; (xi) educational materials and educational equipment primarily for the use of minor dependent children of the debtor; (xii) medical equipment and supplies; (xiii) furniture exclusively for the use of minor children, or elderly or disabled dependents of the debtor; (xiv) personal effects (including the toys and hobby equipment of minor dependent children and wedding rings) of the debtor and the dependents of the debtor; and (xv) 1 personal computer and related equipment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Evans
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.