Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 409 F.2d 225 - Bowman v. United States

Bowman v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

409 F.2d 225 · 1969

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
4
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently March 2013 · most notably United States v. Wagner (1998), United States v. Uptain (1976)

27 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

250196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2114

Relies on United States v. Llanes · Dorrough v. United States · Floyd v. Resor · United States v. Vickers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Judges must be vigilant that requests for appointment of a new attorney on the eve of trial should not become a vehicle for achieving delay.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.