Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 409 F.2d 309 - Arthur G. Popp and Dorothe H. Popp v. Frederic C. Eberlein

Arthur G. Popp and Dorothe H. Popp v. Frederic C. Eberlein’s Empirical Analysis

409 F.2d 309 · 1969

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
4
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2010

10 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

90196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 19 Cal. 2d 807 - Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving Association · McCourt v. Algiers · Gorski v. Commercial Insurance Co. of Newark, NJ · Presser v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Controversies over title to land within a state are particularly appropriate for determination by the courts of that state. We find nothing anywhere to imply that state courts lack power to decide such questions in a quiet title action on the ground that the conveyances were governed by federal law and were an exercise of federal power.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.