Borum v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
409 F.2d 433 · 1967
Citation profile
68 federal appellate · 1 district · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 92 later decisions — most recently September 2017 · most notably United States v. Villano (1987), United States v. Busic (1981)
68 federal appellate · 1 district · 22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 5005
Relies on United States v. Wade · Stovall v. Denno · Gilbert v. California · Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Douglas v. People of State of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The oral sentence constitutes the judgment of the court and is the authority for the execution of the court's sentence. The written commitment is mere evidence of such authority.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(A)bsent a specification of consecutiveness, multiple sentences operate concurrently,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“It was the pronouncement of sentence ... that constituted the judgment of the court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.