Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 409 F.2d 445 - Allison v. United States

Allison v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

409 F.2d 445 · 1969

Citation profile

141
cited by 141 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
12
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

86 federal appellate · 42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 141 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2022 · most notably Rutledge v. United States (1996), United States v. Dhinsa (2001)

86 federal appellate · 42 state decisions — followed in 12 states

7001969197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2106

Relies on Holland v. United States · Opper v. United States · Smith v. United States · Curley v. United States · LundBerg v. Bannan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 141 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t must be clear (1) that the evidence adduced at trial fails to support one or more elements of the crime of which appellant was convicted, (2) that such evidence sufficiently sustains all the elements of another offense, (3) that the latter is a lesser included offense of the former, and (4) that no undue prejudice will result to the accused.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The Supreme Court or any other court of appellate jurisdiction may affirm, modify, vacate, set aside or reverse any judgment, decree, or order of a court lawfully brought before it for review, and may remand the cause and direct the entry of such appropriate judgment, decree, or order, or require such further proceedings to be had as may be just under the circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “affirm, modify, vacate, set aside or reverse any judgment . . . and direct the entry of such appropriate judgment . . . as may be just under the circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.