Maynard v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
409 F.2d 505 · 1969
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
May 1976
most recently cited
17 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 50 U.S.C. § 3806 · 50 U.S.C. § 3811
Relies on Dickinson v. United States · Witmer v. United States · Blalock v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The ‘basis in fact’ which will support the Board’s decisions need not even rise to the level of ‘substantial evidence.’ All that is required is that where the registrant has made out a prima facie case for exemption, there must be ‘some proof that is incompatible with the registrant’s proof o,f exemption.’ Dickinson v. United States, 346 U.S. 389, 396 , 74 S.Ct. 152, 157 , 98 L.Ed. 132 (1953).” [Page 506.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lewine v. Laird
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.