Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 409 F.2d 59 - Frederick Keith Calloway v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections

Frederick Keith Calloway v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections’s Empirical Analysis

409 F.2d 59 · 1969

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
6
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently February 2012 · most notably United States v. Hearst (1977), Lesko v. Lehman (1991)

29 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

200196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · Gideon v. Wainwright · Simmons v. United States · Escobedo v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is clear that when a defendant voluntarily testifies to the merits, and not just upon a purely collateral matter, the prosecutor may comment upon the defendant's failure to deny or explain incriminating facts already in evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[b]efore taking the stand appellant's attorney announced to the Court that appellant was testifying only as to the manner in which the confession was obtained. During the course of his testimony appellant stated at least three times 'I didn't do it.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.