Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 409 F.2d 847 - James T. Kearney, Jr. v. John W. MacY Jr., and U.S.A.

James T. Kearney, Jr. v. John W. MacY Jr., and U.S.A.’s Empirical Analysis

409 F.2d 847 · 1969

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 1973
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United Public Workers of America v. Mitchell · Kane v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In our opinion, that case [Mitchell] insofar as it deals with an employee of the United States government such as appellant Kearney, and with a violation of the Hatch Act of the type that Kearney was found to have committed, has not been overruled either expressly or by implication by subsequent decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.