Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 409 F.2d 857 - Roger R. Haller v. Allan, L. Robbins, Warden of the Maine State Prison

Roger R. Haller v. Allan, L. Robbins, Warden of the Maine State Prison’s Empirical Analysis

409 F.2d 857 · 1969

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
6
states following
July 2020
most recently cited

49 federal appellate · 5 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably Simer v. Rios (1981), United States v. Innamorati (1993)

49 federal appellate · 5 district · 10 state decisions

2901969197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Townsend v. Sain · Williams v. People of State of New York · Townsend v. Burke · Mempa v. Rhay

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not only is it a gross breach of the appearance of justice when defendant's principal adversary is given private access to the ear of the court, it is a dangerous procedure.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “improper for the prosecutor to convey information or to discuss any matter relating to the merits of the case or sentence with the judge in the absence of counsel.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he firmness of the court's belief [in the prosecutor's position] may well have been due not only to the fact that the prosecutor got in his pitch first, - 151 - but, even more insidiously, to the very relationship . . . that permitted such [ex parte] disclosures.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.