Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

409 F.2d 9

Docket No. 13118.

United States v. Walsh

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1969.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1969-04-15

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1969

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1969-04-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*10Franklin Smith, Elkin, N. C., for appellant.

¶2William H. Murdock, U. S. Atty. (H. Marshall Simpson, Asst. U. S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.

¶3Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and BOREMAN and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM:

¶5There is abundant evidence in this routine nontax-paid liquor case that the defendant violated the Internal Revenue laws, as charged, by selling large quantities of nontax-paid whiskey to a government undercover agent. There is not the slightest indication in the record of entrapment, and the contention to the contrary is frivolous.

¶6Affirmed.

/409/f2d/9 · .json · Public domain