Haas v. Kelly Services, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
409 F.3d 1030 · 2005
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 623 (§ 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Mesnick v. General Electric Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“can avoid summary judgment only if the evidence considered in its entirety (1) created a fact issue as to whether [KCPD's] proffered reasons are pretextual and (2) created a reasonable inference that age was a determinative factor in the adverse employment decision.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“affirming). Peterson v. Scott County, 406 F.3d 515, 520 (8th Cir.2005) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“replaced by someone substantially younger.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.