Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 409 F.3d 286 - Calvert v. Firstar Finance, Inc.

Calvert v. Firstar Finance, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

409 F.3d 286 · 2005

Citation profile

188
cited by 188 later decisions
1
states following
February 2022
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 188 later decisions — most recently February 2022 · most notably Glenn v. MetLife (2006), Montour v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance (2009)

34 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

980200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Firestone Tire and Rubber Company v. Bruch · Black & Decker Disability Plan v. Nord · Nowak v. Trezevant · Wilkins v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc. · Davis Farmers Bank Capital Trust Co of Frankfort Kentucky v. Kentucky Finance Cos Retirement Plan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 188 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “reliance on a file review does not, standing alone, require the conclusion that [a plan administrator] acted improperly.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The Court would have a better feel for the weight to accord this conflict if Calvert had explored the issue through discovery.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““[C]ourts have no warrant to require administrators automatically to accord special weight to the opinions of a claimant’s physician; nor may courts impose on plan administrators a discrete burden of explanation when they credit reliable evidence that conflicts with a treating physician’s evaluation.” Black & Decker Disability Plan v. Nord, 538 U.S. 822, 834 [, 123 S.Ct. 1965 , 155 L.Ed.2d 1034 ] (2003). The Supreme Court nonetheless admonished that “[p]lan administrators ... may not arbitrarily refuse to credit a claimant’s reliable evidence, including the opinions of a treating physician.” Id.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.