Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 409 F.3d 607 - Voci v. Gonzales

Voci v. Gonzales’s Empirical Analysis

409 F.3d 607 · 2005

Citation profile

203
cited by 203 later decisions
June 2024
most recently cited

22 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 203 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably Chavarria v. Gonzalez (2006), Chukwu v. Attorney General of the United States (2007)

22 federal appellate ·

1000200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Ventura · Chen Yun Gao v. Ashcroft · Dia v. Ashcroft · Abdulai v. Ashcroft · Mohamed Abdille v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 203 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[O]ur cases suggest that isolated incidents that do not result in serious injury do not rise to the level of persecution.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]his Court has not yet drawn a precise line concerning where a simple beating ends and persecution begins,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[W]here an asylum applicant has established past persecution, the existence of that persecution gives rise to a presumption that the applicant has a well-founded fear of future persecution. This presumption may be rebutted, however, if the government establishes, by a preponderance of the evidence, that there has been a fundamental change in circumstances such that the applicant no longer has a well-founded fear of persecution in his or her home country.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.