Sassé v. United States Department of Labor’s Empirical Analysis
409 F.3d 773 · 2005
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably Hall v. United States Department of Labor, Administrative Review Board (2007), United States v. Cain (2009)
11 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan · Soule Glass & Glazing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board · Kovacevich v. Kent State University · Bell v. Ohio State University
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'Implied consent is not established merely because one party introduced evidence relevant to an unpleaded issue and the opposing party failed to object to its introduction. It must appear that the parties understood the evidence to be aimed at the unpleaded issue.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Creditors v. Lile“the WPA is intended to protect government employees who risk their own personal job security for the advancement of the public good by disclosing abuses by government personnel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.