Adc Telecommunications Inc Securities Litigation v. Adc’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 2020
6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. Gilbertson · Hughes Aircraft Company v. United States · Chenault v. United States Postal Service · Nichols v. Bowersox
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No action shall be maintained to enforce any liability created under section 77k [section 11] or 771(a)(2) [section 12(a)(2)] of this title unless brought within one year after the discovery of the untrue statement or the omission, or after such discovery should have been made by the exercise of reasonable diligence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“literal reading of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act’s effective-dale clause would lead to a puzzling result”). 5 . I note further that even if the Defendants' grammatical argument were persuasive, it would be equally damaging to the Defendants’ own construction —”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.