409 Ill. App. 3d 1 - People v. Ingram’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 122 Ill. 2d 176 - People v. Enoch · 215 Ill. 2d 167 - People v. Herron · 238 Ill. 2d 598 - People v. Thompson · 103 Ill. 2d 472 - People v. Zehr · 166 Ill. 2d 204 - Bright v. Dicke
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he court's method of inquiry shall provide each juror an opportunity to respond to specific questions concerning the principles set out in this section.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“defendant has the burden of proving that there is at least 'some evidence' of serious provocation or the trial court may deny the instruction”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Melecio“shall ask each potential juror, individually or in a group, whether that juror understands and accepts”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.