Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 409 Mass. 408 - Commonwealth v. Phoenix

Commonwealth v. Phoenix’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
3
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATES (1991), Commonwealth v. Tucceri (1992)

3 federal appellate · 42 state decisions

340199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Agurs · Arizona v. Youngblood · Isaksen v. Vermont Castings, Inc. · Commonwealth v. Kozec · Commonwealth v. Domanski

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]hese considerations were purely ones of trial strategy, and, therefore, there is no reason to permit the filing of the affidavit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.