Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 409 N.W.2d 243 - Holmquist v. State

Holmquist v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 1988
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Betlach v. Wayzata Condominium · Cracraft v. City of St. Louis Park · Cairl v. State · Cook v. Trovatten · Williamson v. Cain

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The rule which has emerged from our decision is “that if, by reason of peculiar facts or circumstances, a pitfall, trap, or snare dangerous to a traveler proceeding with reasonable care is created in respect to a street, a municipality owes a duty to exercise reasonable care to warn or otherwise protect such traveler from the resulting danger.” Mix v. City of Minneapolis, 219 Minn. 389, 395 , 18 N.W.2d 130, 132 [1945].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The state will pay compensation for injury to or loss of property or personal injury or death caused by an act or omission of any employee of the state while acting within the scope of his office or employment under circumstances where the state, if a private person, would be liable to the claimant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.