Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 409 P.2d 321 - State v. Keep

State v. Keep’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 2019

6 state decisions

30196519701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3731

Relies on United States v. Evans · State v. Robbins · People v. Webb · People v. Horn · State v. Ginther

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(a) The supreme court has final appellate jurisdiction in all actions and. proceedings. The supreme court may issue injunctions, writs of review, mandamus, certiorari, prohibition, habeas corpus, and all other writs necessary or proper to the complete exercise of its jurisdiction. Each justice may issue a writ of habeas corpus, upon petition by or on behalf of any person held in actual custody and may make the writ returnable before the justice himself or before the supreme court, or before any judge of the superior court of the state. An appeal to the supreme court is a matter of right, ex cept that the state shall have no right of appeal in criminal cases, except to test the sufficiency of the indictment or information and under (b) of this section. (b) The supreme court has jurisdiction to hear appeals of sentences of imprisonment lawfully imposed by the superior courts on the grounds that the sentence is excessive or too lenient and, in the exercise of this • jurisdiction, may modify the sentence as pro- ' vided by law and by the constitution of this state. For the purpose of considering ap-peaHs of sentences on these grounds, the supreme court may sit in divisions.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is our belief, however, that the prosecution's right to appeal or review is generally limited to decisions quashing or dismissing indictments or arresting judgments... . [4]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “lay down rules that may be of vital interest to persons”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.