Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 409 SC 73 - In re Stephen W.

In re Stephen W.’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McKeiver v. Pennsylvania · Joytime Distributors & Amusement Co. v. State · State v. Jones · Davis v. County of Greenville · Westvaco Corp. v. South Carolina Department of Revenue

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This Court has a very limited scope of review in cases involving a constitutional challenge to a statute. All statutes are presumed constitutional and will, if possible, be construed so as to render them valid. A legislative act will not be declared unconstitutional unless its repugnance to the constitution is clear and beyond a reasonable doubt. A legislative enactment will be declared unconstitutional only when its invalidity appears so clearly as to leave no room for reasonable doubt that it violates a provision of the constitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.