Soto v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 1982
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 53 Cal. 2d 772 - In Re Cooper · Cooper v. Pitchess · Ennist v. Baden · 49 So. 2d 798 - Richard v. Tomlinson · Ex Parte Arrington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he accused, on the date said crime was committed, committed an act in a state other than the State of New York intentionally resulting in the commission of said crime in the State of New York, or that the accused was present in this State at the time of the commission of the crime and that he had thereafter fled from the justice of this state and may now be found in the State of Florida.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the continued desirability of according to the Uniform Interstate Extradition Act, Chapter 941, Part 1, a more restrictive construction, as reflected by the decision of Ennist v. Baden, supra , than is accorded the Act by other courts of last resort.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[h]e committed acts in a State other than the State of Virginia ultimately resulting in the commission of a crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.