Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 1987
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 383 So. 2d 1186 - Beugnet v. Beugnet · 338 So. 2d 1141 - Deloach v. State · Landahl v. Smith · Wiggins v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In this case, we hold that Johnson was taken into custody for speedy trial purposes when he was questioned at the police station. He appeared at the police station for questioning after being told that an arrest warrant would be issued if he did not show up. Use of formal words of arrest are not essential to start the speedy clock running.” (cases cited)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Wright“when the person is arrested as a result of the conduct or criminal episode which gave rise to the crime charged, ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.