409 So. 2d 563 - State v. Green’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably State v. Williams (1984), 442 So. 2d 1129 - State v. Clark (1983)
35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Sepulvado · 354 So. 2d 1332 - State v. Schwartz · 385 So. 2d 248 - State v. Byrd · 400 So. 2d 1063 - State v. Martin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A. Armed robbery is the taking of anything of value belonging to another from the person of another or that is in the immediate control of another, by use of force or intimidation, while armed with a dangerous weapon.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Robinson · Reed v. Butler“A. Armed robbery is the theft of anything of value ... while armed with a dangerous weapon. " (Emphasis added.) The defendant's argument is that the toy pellet gun he had is not an inherently dangerous weapon and that in the manner it was used could cause harm to no one. La.R.S. 14:2(3) defines dangerous weapon to include, "gas, liquid or other substance or instrumentality, which, in the manner used, is calculated or likely to produce death or great bodily harm.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bruno · Reed v. Butler“The use of an inherently harmless object in a manner that creates circumstances likely to produce death or great bodily harm results in the inherently harmless object being a dangerous weapon within the provisions of LA. R.S. 14:2(3) and 14:64.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.