409 So. 2d 958 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2010
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Marion · Smith v. Hooey · Strunk v. United States · Pomponio v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“with the circuit clerk's office on July 13, 1984. Appellant now contends that this letter was sent pursuant to the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act, § 15-9-80 through § 15-9-88 , Code of Alabama 1975. Appellant argues that since he was not returned to Alabama within 180 days from the date on his letter, the Act requires that the charges against him be dismissed. The method by which”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a defendant incarcerated in one state may request to be transferred to another state to stand trial on charges for which the other state has placed a detainer on him,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The major prejudice incurred by the appellant was the preclusion of the possibility that the Alabama and Georgia sentences could run concurrently.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.