Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 409 U.S. 188 - Neil v. Biggers

Neil v. Biggers’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

12,351
cited by 12,351 later decisions
84
cited 84 times by the Supreme Court
49
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

2,335 federal appellate · 270 district · 7,683 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12,351 later decisions (84 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2026 · most notably Manson v. Brathwaite (1977), Cuyler v. Sullivan (1980)

2,335 federal appellate · 270 district · 7,683 state decisions — followed in 49 states

3.7k0197219801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedBiggers v. Neil (from Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Simmons v. United States · Stovall v. Denno · Fay v. Noia

Cited together with Simmons v. United States · Manson v. Brathwaite · Stovall v. Denno · United States v. Wade · Foster v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12,351 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the opportunity of the witness to view the criminal at the time of the crime, the witness’ degree of attention, the accuracy of the witness’ prior description of the criminal, the level of certainty demonstrated by the witness at the confrontation, and the length of time between the crime and the confrontation.”
    808 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “substantial likelihood of misidentification.”
    47 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “so unnecessarily suggestive and conducive to irreparable mistaken identification”
    20 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.