Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 409 U.S. 57 - Ward v. Village of Monroeville

Ward v. Village of Monroeville’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

1,472
cited by 1,472 later decisions
57
cited 57 times by the Supreme Court
46
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

346 federal appellate · 93 district · 561 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,472 later decisions (57 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2026 · most notably Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. (1982), Arnett v. Kennedy (1974)

346 federal appellate · 93 district · 561 state decisions — followed in 46 states

3910197219801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tumey v. State of Ohio · Raley v. Ohio · McNeil v. Director, Patuxent Institution · Dugan v. Ohio

Cited together with Tumey v. State of Ohio · In the Matters of Lee Roy Murchison and John Whites · Gibson v. Berryhill · Withrow v. Larkin · Aetna Life Insurance v. Lavoie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,472 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “direct, personal, substantial pecuniary interest”
    70 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[p]etitioner [was] entitled to a neutral and detached judge in the first instance.”
    40 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “general overall supervision of village affairs”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.