Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 409 U.S. 919 - James Chongris v. Hugh A. Corrigan

James Chongris v. Hugh A. Corrigan’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
June 1992
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1992

8 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

70197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Village of Euclid Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co · Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon · United States v. Causby · Griggs v. County of Allegheny Pennsylvania · 55 Wash. 2d 400 - Ackerman v. Port of Seattle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In 1946, this Court articulated the standard to be applied in testing flight patterns over private property against the Just Compensation Clause of the Fifth Amendment. United States v. Causby, 328 U. S. 256 . We held that ‘the flight of airplanes, which skim the surface but do not touch it, is as much an appropriation of the use of the land as a more conventional entry upon it.’ We noted that the important factor is whether the intrusion impinges on ‘the owner’s full enjoyment of the property and ... his exploitation of it.’ Id., at 264-265 . And, in 1962, we reiterated that standard. Griggs v. Allegheny County, 369 U. S. 84 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.