Albert v. Salzman’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1984
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on David J. Greene & Co. v. Schenley Industries, Inc. · Basch v. Talley Industries, Inc. · Pikor v. Cinerama Productions Corp. · Marco v. Sachs · Marco v. Sachs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A merged corporation does not by merger lose a cause of action which it had prior to the merger (Business Corporation Law § 906(b)(3)). 1 Consequently a derivative action on its behalf survives the merger [citations omitted]. So far as the individual defendants are concerned, whether the action be regarded as derivative or representative there is no difficulty. Concededly if the action is representative no obstacle to suit is presented.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lewis v. Anderson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.