Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 Ala. App. 19 - Thomas v. State

41 Ala. App. 19 - Thomas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
3
states following
November 2002
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently November 2002

2 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

10019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. State Ex Rel. Davis · Smith v. State · Hussey v. State · Boyette v. State · Forman v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n such circumstances it is error if the trial court does not so limit such evidence upon request of the defendant”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(A) correct ruling will not be disturbed because of insufficient or wrong reasons therefor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.