Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 41 Ala. App. 212 - Oden v. State

41 Ala. App. 212 - Oden v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
August 2001
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 2001

16 state decisions

4019611970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Edwards v. State · 40 Ala. App. 45 - Orr v. State · Orr v. State · 19 Ala. App. 113 - Gidley v. State · 117 So. 2d 104 - Day v. National-US Radiator Corporation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Our cases perhaps encourage written verdicts for the sake of accuracy and to avoid delays incident to corrections. Allen v. State, 52 Ala. 391 ; Edwards v. State, 205 Ala. 160 , 87 So. 179 . But a court which receives an oral verdict is not in error if the verdict is otherwise proper. State v. Underwood, 2 Ala. 744 ; Pate v. State, 19 Ala.App. 548 , 98 So. 819 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “On review we cannot treat the two counts as charging an indivisible crime or even yoked offenses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.